Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Jun-12, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Should we do that now, or wait till after next week's releases?
> IMO this has been hammered enough in master, and we still have a few
> days in the back-branches for buildfarm, that it's okay to do it now.
Poking at that, I find that a1a789eb5 back-patches reasonably painlessly
into v11 and v10, but trying to bring it back to 9.6 encounters a pile of
merge failures. Also, looking at the git logs shows that we did a hell
of a lot of subtle work on that code (libpqwalreceiver.c in particular)
during the v10 cycle. So I've got no confidence that successful
buildfarm/beta1 testing of the HEAD patch means much of anything for
putting it into pre-v10 branches.
Given that we've seen few if any field reports of this issue, my
inclination is to back-patch as far as v10, but not take the risk
and effort involved in going further.
regards, tom lane
