Hi, On June 9, 2019 8:36:37 AM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >"Goel, Dhruv" <goeld...@amazon.com> writes: >I think you are mistaken that doing transactional updates in pg_index >is OK. If memory serves, we rely on xmin of the pg_index row for >purposes >such as detecting whether a concurrently-created index is safe to use >yet.
We could replace that with storing a 64 xid in a normal column nowadays. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
