Hi, On 2019-06-01 15:09:46 -0400, Michael Paquier wrote: > While going through the table AM callbacks, I have bumped into a > couple of references to heap. I think that we should make that more > generic by using the term "table" as done when opening relations and > such. Attached is a cleanup patch.
I'm unbothered by this, but I'm also not opposed to changing this. It's largely just keeping the previous code / comment. > While on it, I found a set of typos which looked like a copy-pasto > which got spread => "index_nfo". Yea, we should fix this. Greetings, Andres Freund
