On Sat, 25 May 2019 at 00:18, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: > I admittedly haven't followed this thread too closely, but if having 100 > partitions causes out of memory on pg11, that sounds like a massive > regression to me.
For it to have regressed it would have had to once have been better, but where was that mentioned? The only thing I saw was non-partitioned tables compared to partitioned tables, but you can't really say it's a regression if you're comparing apples to oranges. I think the only regression here is in the documents from bebc46931a1 having removed the warning about too many partitions in a partitioned table at the end of ddl.sgml. As Amit mentions, we'd like to put something back about that. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
