Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:55:59AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Well, it's confusing that we're not consistent about which spellings
>> are accepted. The GUC system accepts true/false, on/off, and 0/1, so
>> it seems reasonable to me to standardize on that treatment across the
>> board. That's not necessarily something we have to do for v12, but
>> longer-term, consistency is of value.
> +1.
> Note: boolean GUCs accept a bit more: yes, no, tr, fa, and their upper
> case flavors, etc. These are everything parse_bool():bool.c accepts
> as valid values.
I'm not excited about allowing abbreviated keywords here, though.
Allowing true/false, on/off, and 0/1 seems reasonable but let's
not go overboard.
regards, tom lane
