On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 10:15:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > +1 for a HEAD-only change. I think the only really good arguments > for back-patching would be if this were causing compiler warnings > (but we've seen none) or if we thought it would likely lead to > hazards for back-patching future bug fixes (but the adjacent lines > seem unlikely to change).
If it were to generate warnings, we would have already caught them as this comes from 1171dbd. Committed to HEAD. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
