Hi, On 2019-05-10 16:18:32 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2019-May-10, Andres Freund wrote: > > > My personal opinion is that this is more churn than I think is useful to > > tackle after feature freeze, with not sufficient benefits. If others > > chime in, voting to do this, I'm OK with doing that, but otherwise I > > think there's more important stuff to do. > > One issue is that if we don't change things now, we can never change it > afterwards, so we should make some effort to ensure that naming is > sensible. And we already changed the names of the whole interface.
Well, the point is that there's symmetry with a lot of similar functions that were *not* affected by the tableam changes. Cf. systable_beginscan et al. We could add wrappers etc to make it less painful, but then there's no urgency either. Greetings, Andres Freund
