On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:21:09PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote: > Em qua, 8 de mai de 2019 às 14:19, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> > escreveu: >> The question is; we should support vacuumdb option for (1), i.e.,, >> something like --index-cleanup option is added? >> Or for (2), i.e., something like --disable-index-cleanup option is added >> as your patch does? Or for both? > > --index-cleanup=BOOL
I agree with Euler's suggestion to have a 1-1 mapping between the option of vacuumdb and the VACUUM parameter, because that's more intuitive: - --index-cleanup=3Dfalse =3D> VACUUM (INDEX_CLEANUP=3Dfalse) - --index-cleanup=3Dtrue =3D> VACUUM (INDEX_CLEANUP=3Dtrue) - no --index-cleanup means to rely on the reloption. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
