Greetings,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghack...@gmail.com> writes:
> >>> IMHO, what makes more sense is to show the name of associated toast
> >>> table in the \dt+ of the normal table.
>
> >> I'm not for that: it's useless information in at least 99.44% of cases.
>
> > I don't think I'd put it in \dt+, but the toast table is still
> > pg_toast.pg_toast_{relOid}, right? What about showing the OID of the
> > table in the \d output, eg:
> > => \d comments
> > Table "public.comments" (50788)
>
> Not unless you want to break every regression test that uses \d.
> Instability of the output is also a reason not to show the
> toast table's name in the parent's \d[+].So we need a way to turn it off. That doesn't seem like it'd be hard to implement and the information is certainly quite useful. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
