At Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:34:38 +0900, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote
in <20190423023438.gh2...@paquier.xyz>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 09:19:33PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > The attached exercises this sequence, needing some changes in
> > PostgresNode.pm and RecursiveCopy.pm to allow tablespaces.
>
> + # Check for symlink -- needed only on source dir
> + # (note: this will fall through quietly if file is already gone)
> + if (-l $srcpath)
> + {
> + croak "Cannot operate on symlink \"$srcpath\""
> + if ($srcpath !~ /\/(pg_tblspc\/[0-9]+)$/);
> +
> + # We have mapped tablespaces. Copy them individually
> + my $linkname = $1;
> + my $tmpdir = TestLib::tempdir;
> + my $dstrealdir = TestLib::real_dir($tmpdir);
> + my $srcrealdir = readlink($srcpath);
> +
> + opendir(my $dh, $srcrealdir);
> + while (readdir $dh)
> + {
> + next if (/^\.\.?$/);
> + my $spath = "$srcrealdir/$_";
> + my $dpath = "$dstrealdir/$_";
> +
> + copypath($spath, $dpath);
> + }
> + closedir $dh;
> +
> + symlink $dstrealdir, $destpath;
> + return 1;
> + }
>
> The same stuff is proposed here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cagrczquxd9yofifokxofj+fp3jdpoekczt+zh_prmnaadae...@mail.gmail.com
>
> So there is a lot of demand for making the recursive copy more skilled
> at handling symlinks for tablespace tests, and I'd like to propose to
> do something among those lines for the tests on HEAD, presumably for
> v12 and not v13 as we are talking about a bug fix here? I am not sure
> yet which one of the proposals is better than the other though.
TBH I like that (my one cieted above) not so much. However, I
prefer to have v12 if this is a bug and to be fixed in
v12. Otherwise we won't add a test for this later:p
Anyway I'll visit there. Thanks.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
