On 2019-Apr-15, David Rowley wrote: > To be honest, if I'd done a better job of thinking through the > implications of this tablespace inheritance in ca4103025d, then I'd > probably have not bothered submitting a patch for it. We could easily > revert that, but we'd still be left with the same behaviour in > partitioned indexes, which is in PG11.
Well, I suppose if we do decide to revert it for tables, we should do it for both tables and indexes. But as I said, I'm not yet convinced that this is the best way forward. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
