Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:19:01PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
>> Socket has different semantic from TCP/UDP. We can't add socket
>> information into client_addr unless we are prepared to break this view
>> (client_addr has type inet and it would be necessary to change it to
>> text). It could break a lot of applications.
Agreed.
> client_addr does not seem the right place to store this information,
> and it is already documented for years that NULL is used when using a
> Unix socket. But I think that we could change *client_hostname* so as
> the path name is reported instead of NULL when connecting through a
> Unix domain socket, and there is no need to switch the field type for
> that.
That seems like a hack, and I think it could still break apps that
are expecting particular semantics for that field. Why not add a
new column instead?
regards, tom lane
