On 2019-04-11 05:59, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 03:50:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> And here is the patch to address this issue. It happens that a bit >> more than the dependency switch was lacking here: >> - At swap time, we need to have the new index definition track >> relispartition from the old index. >> - Again at swap time, the inheritance link needs to be updated between >> the old/new index and its parent when reindexing a partition index. > > Peter, this is an open item, and I think as the committer of the > feature you are its owner. Well, in this case, I don't mind taking > the ownership as need be as I know this stuff. Anyway, could you have > a look at the patch proposed and see if you have any issues with it?
Looks good, committed. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
