Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2019-04-10 18:35:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> ... What I did instead was to shove >> that test case and some related ones into a new plpgsql test file, >> src/pl/plpgsql/src/sql/plpgsql_trap.sql, so that it's not part of the >> core regression tests at all. (We've talked before about moving >> chunks of plpgsql.sql into the plpgsql module, so this is sort of a >> down payment on that.) Now, if you think about the time to do >> check-world rather than just the core regression tests, this isn't >> obviously a win, and in fact it might be a loss because the plpgsql >> tests run serially not in parallel with anything else.
> Hm, can't we "just" parallelize the plpgsql schedule instead? If somebody wants to work on that, I won't stand in the way, but it seems like material for a different patch. >> Thoughts? Anyone object to making these sorts of changes >> post-feature-freeze? > Hm. There's some advantage to doing so, because it won't break any large > pending changes. But it's also possible that it'll destabilize the > buildfarm some. In personal capacity I'm like +0.5. My thought was that there is (hopefully) going to be a lot of testing going on over the next few months, so making that faster would be a useful activity. regards, tom lane