Hi, Michael-san. > From: Michael Paquier [mailto:mich...@paquier.xyz] > I have just committed the GUC and libpq portion for TCP_USER_TIMEOUT after a > last lookup, and I have cleaned up a couple of places. It is a bit > disappointing > to see the option supported on Linux, but not on Windows, Solaris and BSD as > far as I can see. Still that's useful in itself for more control of the TCP > connection. Hopefully I forgot nobody in the review credits. I confirmed your commitment. Thank you.
> I am marking the CF entry as committed. In the future, it would be better to > not propose multiple concepts on the same thread, and if the socket_timeout > business is resubmitted, I would suggest a completely new CF entry, and a new > thread. Thank you for your suggestion. I think it would be better too. Best regards, --------------------- Ryohei Nagaura
