On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:10:31AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Well, that would be a bit sad. ISTM if we conclude that the current > behaviour is a bug we could commit the current patch and backpatch a > fix to honor a lower toast_tuple_threshold. But yes, time is tight.
48 hours remain, which is very tight. Let's see but the chances are small :( If we think that lowering toast_tuple_threshold should be supported then the patch on the other thread should be used first, perhaps back-patched (it lacks pieces with ALTER TABLE as pointed out as well). If we don't use the other patch, then what's proposed on this thread is actually wrong and should be reworked. In any case, something is wrong. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
