Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> I'm not very sure why the integer/pointer confusion in pgstat_bestart >> doesn't cause hard crashes when using gss auth --- or does >> this suite not actually test that?
> Isn't it just saying that because of the implicit declaration..? > Once that's fixed, the integer/pointer warning will go away, but > it's actually a pointer in either case, hence why it isn't crashing. Well, if the caller thinks what is being passed back is an int, it will do a 32-to-64-bit widening, which is almost certainly going to result in a corrupted pointer. > The test suite does test GSS authentication and GSS encryption. Hm. I'll poke at this more closely. regards, tom lane