On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:18:45AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Looks good. Maybe we should list the "role having sufficient permissions" > before superuser, "just because", but not something I feel strongly about.
Listing the superuser after sounds fine to me. > The part about CHECKPOINT also looks pretty good, but that's entirely > unrelated, right? :) Completely unrelated, but as we are on this part of the documentation now, and as we discussed that stuff face-to-face last September where I actually promised to write a patch without doing it for seven months, I see no problems to tackle this issue as well now. Better later than never :) I would like to apply this down to 9.5 for the checkpoint part and down to 11 for the role part, so if anybody has any comments, please feel free. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
