Tom, Thank you. > (1) Backwards compatibility, and (2) it's not clear that a different > layout would be a win for all cases.
I am curious regarding (2), for my understanding it is good to find out at least one case when layout with lengths/offsets in a header will be crucially worse. I will be happy if someone can elaborate. сб, 30 мар. 2019 г. в 17:26, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > > =?UTF-8?B?0J/QsNCy0LvRg9GF0LjQvSDQmNCy0LDQvQ==?= <vololo...@gmail.com> writes: > > Does anyone know why the format is still the same? > > (1) Backwards compatibility, and (2) it's not clear that a different > layout would be a win for all cases. > > regards, tom lane -- Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin
