Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2019-Apr-01, Tom Lane wrote: >> Seems reasonable. Pushed with minor documentation editing.
> Ah, so we now we can get rid of the TState * being passed around > separately for expression execution, too? I didn't really look for follow-on simplifications, but if there are some to be made, great. (That would be further evidence for my opinion that this feature was overcomplicated ...) regards, tom lane