On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 8:44 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Overall I'm inclined to think that we're making the same mistake here > that we did with work_mem, namely, assuming that you can control a > bunch of different prefetching behaviors with a single GUC and things > will be OK. Let's just create a new GUC for this and default it to 10 > or something and go home.
I agree. If you invent a new GUC, then everybody notices, and it usually has to be justified quite rigorously. There is a strong incentive to use an existing GUC, if only because the problem that this creates is harder to measure than the supposed problem that it avoids. This can perversely work against the goal of making the system easy to use. Stretching the original definition of a GUC is bad. I take issue with the general assumption that not adding a GUC at least makes things easier for users. In reality, it depends entirely on the situation at hand. -- Peter Geoghegan
