David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 10:10, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm unsure how hard we should push to get something like this into v12.
>> I'm concerned that its dependency on list_nth might result in performance
>> regressions in some cases; ...
> However, there's always a danger we find some show-stopper with your
> list reimplementation patch, in which case I wouldn't really like to
> be left with list_skip_forward() in core.
We could always do something like what we've already done with
simple_rel_array and simple_rte_array, ie, replace the eq_classes
List with a manually-managed pointer array. Given the small number
of places that touch that list, it wouldn't be too awful --- but
still, I'd only consider that if the List-reimplementation patch
goes down in flames.
regards, tom lane
