On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:34 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > And then you have to decide what to do about other background > > transactions. > > Not count them if they're implementation details; otherwise count them. > For example, IMO autovacuum transactions should definitely be counted > (as one transaction, even if they run parallel vacuum).
Hmm, interesting. autovacuum isn't an implementation detail? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
