On 3/20/19 3:19 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2019-03-20 15:15:02 -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >> If we are evaluating this whole symlink / renaming thing, there could be >> arguments for a "pgsql" alias to psql (or vice versa), but I don't think >> "pg_sql" makes any sense and could be fairly confusing. > > I don't care much about createdb etc, but I'm *strongly* against > renaming psql and/or adding symlinks. That's like 95% of all > interactions people have with postgres binaries, making that more > confusing would be an enterily unnecessary self own.
Yeah I agree. The only one I would entertain is "pgsql" given enough people refer to PostgreSQL as such, but note I use the term "entertain" in a similar way to when I knowingly watch terrible movies. Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
