On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 04:29:35PM +0400, David Steele wrote: > Please note that there have been objections to the patch later in this > thread by Peter and Robert. I'm not very interested in watering down the > documentation changes as Peter suggests, but I think at the very least we > should commit the added hints in the error message. For many users this > error will be their first point of contact with the backup_label > issue/behavior.
The updates of the log message do not imply anything negative as I read them as they mention to not remove the backup_label file. So while we don't have an agreement about the docs, the log messages may be able to be committed? Peter? Robert? "will result in a corruptED cluster" is more correct? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
