On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:27 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz>
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 07:49:11PM +0800, Shaoqi Bai wrote:
> > Thanks, will work on it as you suggested
> > Add pg_basebackup --T olddir=newdir to support check the consistency of a
> > tablespace created before promotion
> > Add run_test('remote');
>
> Thanks for considering my input.  Why don't you register your patch to
> the next commit fest then so as it goes through a formal review once
> you are able to provide a new version?  The commit fest is here:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/
>
> We are currently in the process of wrapping up the last commit fest
> for v12, so this stuff will have to wait a bit :(
>
> It could be an idea to split the patch in two pieces:
> - One patch which refactors the code for the new option in
> PostgresNode.pm
> - Second patch for the new test with integration in RewindTest.pm.
> This should touch different parts of the code, so combining both would
> be fine as well for me :)
>

Thanks for your advice, sorry for taking so long to give update in the
thread, because I am stuck in modifing Perl script, knowing little about
Perl language.

I tried to do the following two things in this patch.
1. add pg_basebackup --T olddir=newdir to support check the consistency of
a tablespace created before promotion
2. run both run_test('local') and run_test('remote');

The code can pass make installcheck under src/bin/pg_rewind, but can not
pass make installcheck under src/bin/pg_basebackup.
Because the patch refactor is not done well.

The patch still need refactor, to make other tests pass, like tests under
src/bin/pg_basebackup.
Sending the letter is just to let you know the little progress on the
thread.

Attachment: 0001-Add-tablespace-tap-test-for-pg_rewind.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to