Hello. At Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:30:07 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in <20190315.173007.147577546.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > The patch relies on the fact(?) that the lowest index is always > -1 in range partition and uses it as pseudo default > partition. I'm not sure it is really the fact and anyway it > donsn't seem the right thing to do. Could you explain how it > works, not what you did in this patch?
I understood how it works but still uneasy that only list partitioning requires scan_default. Anyway please ignore this. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
