On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:17 PM Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deola...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I think that since COPY FREEZE can be executed only when the table is
>> created or truncated within the transaction other users cannot insert
>> any rows during COPY FREEZE.
>>
>
> Right. But the truncating transaction can insert unfrozen rows into the table
> before inserting more rows via COPY FREEZE.
>
> postgres=# CREATE EXTENSION pageinspect ;
> CREATE EXTENSION
> postgres=# BEGIN;
> BEGIN
> postgres=# TRUNCATE testtab ;
> TRUNCATE TABLE
> postgres=# INSERT INTO testtab VALUES (100, 200);
> INSERT 0 1
> postgres=# COPY testtab FROM STDIN WITH (FREEZE);
> Enter data to be copied followed by a newline.
> End with a backslash and a period on a line by itself, or an EOF signal.
> >> 1 2
> >> 2 3
> >> \.
> COPY 2
> postgres=# COMMIT;
>
> postgres=# SELECT lp, to_hex(t_infomask) FROM
> heap_page_items(get_raw_page('testtab', 0));
> lp | to_hex
> ----+--------
> 1 | 800
> 2 | b00
> 3 | b00
> (3 rows)
>
> The first row in inserted by regular insert and it's not frozen. The next 2
> are frozen. We can't mark such as page all-visible, all-frozen.
Understood. Thank you for explanation!
>
>>
>>
>> I'd suggest to measure performance overhead. I can imagine one use
>> case of COPY FREEZE is the loading a very large table. Since in
>> addition to set visibility map bits this patch could scan a very large
>> table I'm concerned that how much performance is degraded by this
>> patch.
>
>
> Ok. I will run some tests. But please note that this patch is a bug fix to
> address the performance issue that is caused by having to rewrite the entire
> table when all-visible bit is set on the page during first vacuum. So while
> we may do some more work during COPY FREEZE, we're saving a lot of page
> writes during next vacuum. Also, since the scan that we are doing in this
> patch is done on a page that should be in the buffer cache, we will pay a bit
> in terms of CPU cost, but not anything in terms of IO cost.
Agreed. I had been misunderstanding this patch. The page scan during
COPY FREEZE is necessary and it's very cheaper than doing in the first
vacuum.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
