On 2019-Mar-08, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Peter Eisentraut 2019-03-08
> <3eb194cf-b878-1f63-8623-6d6add0ed...@2ndquadrant.com>
> > On 2019-02-21 10:37, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > diff --git a/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c b/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c
> > > index a18a6f6c45..8080626e94 100644
> > > --- a/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c
> > > +++ b/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c
> > > @@ -1794,12 +1794,14 @@ run_schedule(const char *schedule, test_function
> > > tfunc)
> > > else
> > > {
> > > status(_("FAILED"));
> > > + status(" "); /* align with
> > > failed (ignored) */
> > > fail_count++;
> > > }
> >
> > So an issue here is that in theory "FAILED" etc. are marked for
> > translation but your spacers do not take that into account. Personally,
> > I have no ambition to translate pg_regress, so we could remove all that.
> > But it should be done consistently in either case.
>
> Oh, right. So the way to go would be to use _("FAILED "), and
> ask translators to use the same length.
Note there's no translation for pg_regress. All these _() markers are
currently dead code. It seems hard to become motivated to translate
that kind of program. I don't think it has much value, myself.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
