čt 7. 3. 2019 v 18:45 odesílatel Andrew Dunstan < andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> napsal:
> > On 3/7/19 12:41 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > > > čt 7. 3. 2019 v 18:35 odesílatel Andrew Dunstan > > <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com > > <mailto:andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com>> napsal: > > > > > > > > > > The other thing that bugs me a bit about the patch is that the only > > testing it does it to make sure that pragmas are ignored by the core > > plpgsql processor. Maybe that's enough, but mostly we tend to like to > > have one actual use of a feature. > > > > > > Unfortunately plpgsql_check is not part of upstream > > > > https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check > > > > I can to write some simple extension - some print tracing, that can > > use this feature? > > > > > > Works for me. Another idea I had was some sort of crypto signature pragma. > > > I still think making it block level only is unwarranted, though. > for me it is better than nothing, and it is good - it is not bad compromise. It can be enhanced in future, when there will be good case. I didn't propose any syntax, feature, that block future full implementation compatible with Ada and PL/SQL. Pavel > > cheers > > > andrew > > > -- > Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services > >
