On 2019-Mar-06, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:03 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > One, err, small issue with that idea is that we need the param numbers > > not to conflict for any "progress update providers" that are to be used > > simultaneously by any command. > > Is that really an issue? I think progress reporting -- at least with > the current infrastructure -- is only ever going to be possible for > utility commands, not queries. And those really shouldn't have very > many sorts going on at once.
Well, I don't think it is, but I thought it was worth pointing out explicitly. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
