On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 03:08:09PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > I still don't understand what issue you see in how basebackup verifies > checksums. Can you point me to the explanation you've sent after 11 was > released?
The history is mostly on this thread: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20181020044248.gd2...@paquier.xyz > So you have a workload/configuration that actually results in data > corruption yet we fail to detect that? Or we generate false positives? > Or what do you mean by "100% safe" here? What's proposed on this thread could generate false positives. Checks which have deterministic properties and clean failure handling are reliable when it comes to reports. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
