Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info

[Paul Ramsey]

> On Mar 4, 2019, at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> Paul Ramsey <pram...@cleverelephant.ca> writes:
>> I had what seemed to be working code except for a couple rare cases,
>> but when I fixed those cases it turned out that I had a major problem:
>> building a <var> OP <const> expression works fine, but building a
>> <const> OP <var> expression returns me an error.
> 
> Yup, you're not supposed to do that.  The output expression *must* have
> the index key on the left, it's up to you to commute the operator if
> needed to make that happen.

Gotcha, done and now have an implementation that passes all our regression 
tests.

Thanks!

P