On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 10:48 PM David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 09:57:25PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 7:14 PM David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:14:59AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > + url = psprintf("
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html";,
> > > > +
> > > strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") ? "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION,
> > > > +
> > > QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);
> > >
> > > Do we need to make sure that the docs are published under the major
> > > version as soon as we get to alpha, or do we need something more like
> > > this?
> > >
> > > url = psprintf("https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html";,
> > > (strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") || strstr(PG_VERSION, "beta")
> ||
> > > strstr(PG_VERSION, "alpha")) : "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION,
> > > QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);
> > >
> >
> > We don't really release alphas any more. And we do load the documentation
> > alongside the betas. (Last time we did an alpha was so long ago I don't
> > remember if we loaded docs)
>
> If the first thing we do when we move from devel to some other state
> (beta, RC, etc.) is to publish the docs under the major version
> number, then maybe this test should be more along the lines of looking
> for anything that's neither devel nor a number, extract the number,
> and use that.
>
Well, alpha versions do go under the numeric URL. Whether we load the docs
at that time or not we can just choose -- but there is no reason not to. So
yeah, that sounds like it would work better.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
