On 3/3/19 1:08 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > > jsonb_util.c > ============ > > I see we're now handling NaN values in convertJsonbScalar(). Isn't it > actually a bug that we don't do this already? Or is it not needed for > some reason? >
JSON standard numerics don't support NaN, Infinity etc., so I assume this can only happen in a jsonpath expression being converted to a jsonb value. If so, the new section should contain a comment to that effect, otherwise it will be quite confusing. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
