On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:15 AM Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > It applies and builds clean, it passed make world with cassert and TAP > tests, and I can't see any remaining flaws. This is true both of just > the 0001 v16 patch and that with 0002 v16 applied on top of it.
Thanks. I'd like to commit this soon. > It would be great if someone with a big test machine could stress test > and benchmark this versus current production versions. Hmm. I can't compare it with current production versions directly since SERIALIZABLE + parallel query wasn't possible before. I could compare it against lower isolation levels or non-parallel query, but those tests don't seem to tell us anything we don't already know: SERIALIZABLE slows some stuff down, parallel query speeds some stuff up. As for stress-testing, most benchmarks are either good for testing parallelism (TPC-H etc) but don't do any writes, or good for testing writes (TPC-B etc) but don't do any parallelism. I'm going to experiment with the "SIBENCH" approach from the Cahill paper and see where that leads. -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
