David Rowley <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 at 05:44, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure if the second one is actually a semantics bug or just a
>> misoptimization?  But yeah, +1 for putting in some simple tests for
>> corner cases right now.  Anyone want to propose a specific patch?

> The second is just reducing the planner's flexibility to produce a
> good plan.  The first is a bug. Proposed regression test attached.

LGTM, pushed.

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to