On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:44 AM Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: > No, and Tom stated as much too, but life is all about tradeoffs. Some > people will find this an acceptable compromise. For those that don't > they don't have to use it. IMHO we tend toward too much nannyism too often.
Well, I agree with that, too. Hmm. I don't think there's anything preventing you from implementing this in "userspace," is there? A logging hook could suppress all error message text, and you could just mark all functions leakproof after that, and you'd have this exact behavior in an existing release with no core code changes, I think. If you do that, or just stick this patch into your own distro, I would be interested to hear some experiences from customers (and those who support them) after some time had gone by. I find it hard to imagine delivering customer support in an environment configured this way, but sometimes my imagination is limited. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
