Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > Motivation: A couple of projects propose to add new smgr > implementations alongside md.c in order to use bufmgr.c for more kinds > of files, but it seems entirely bogus to extend the unused smgr type > to cover those.
I agree that smgrtype as it stands is pretty pointless, but what
will we be using instead to get to those other implementations?
regards, tom lane
