On 2019-02-27 22:50, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > However, the continuous > integration stuff has created an expectation that your patch shouldn't > be left to bitrot for long. Silly mechanical bitrot now seems like a > much bigger problem than it was before these developments. It unfairly > puts reviewers off engaging.
If this is the problem (although I think we'd find that OID collisions are rather rare compared to other gratuitous cfbot failures), why not have the cfbot build with a flag that ignores OID collisions? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
