Hi, On 2019-02-26 12:57:14 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 12:19, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > I've put it as 256 args now. > > The overhead of that is about 2kB, so not really an issue.
Why not just allocate it dynamically? Seems weird to have all these MAX_ARGS, MAX_SCRIPTS ... commands. The eighties want their constants back ;) Greetings, Andres Freund