Hi,

On 2019-02-26 12:57:14 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 12:19, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> I've put it as 256 args now.
> 
> The overhead of that is about 2kB, so not really an issue.

Why not just allocate it dynamically? Seems weird to have all these
MAX_ARGS, MAX_SCRIPTS ... commands. The eighties want their constants
back ;)

Greetings,

Andres Freund

Reply via email to