Greetings Mark, * Mark Kirkwood (mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz) wrote: > ISTM that the onus should be on the patch submitter to provide additions to > pg_basebackup that make it as painless as possible for those people *not* > using pgBackRest to continue making backups. Breaking this is just not > right. Submitting patches that mean that people *must* use pgBackRest is > also not right IMHO.
I'm sorry that there's some confusion here- to be clear, no one is required to use pgBackRest. pg_basebackup works quite well and wouldn't be impacted by the changes proposed no this thread. The arguments against removing the exclusive backup feature don't have anything to do with pg_basebackup. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
