Greetings, * Andrew Dunstan (andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 2/22/19 2:15 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2019-02-21 16:27:06 +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote: > >> I have not heard many requests for bringing back the old behavior, but I > >> could easily have missed them. Either way I do not think there would be > >> much > >> demand for an in-place VACUUM FULL unless the index bloat problem is also > >> solved. > > Yea, I don't think there's much either. What I think there's PLENTY need > > for is something like pg_repack in core. And could argue that the > > trigger based logging it does to catch up to changes made concurrently > > with the rewrite, to the old table, is a form of journaling... > > +1. Maybe this is something that should be on the agenda of the next > developers' meeting.
Seems more appropriate to the developer unconference, though perhaps that's what you meant..? Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
