On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 08:02:54PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I'd vote for accepting the extension creation in temporary schemas and
> fixing \dx and \dx+.

Thanks.

> However the error raised by creating extensions
> in temporary schema still looks strange to me. Since we don't search
> functions and operators defined in temporary schemas  (which is stated
> by the doc) unless we use qualified function name we cannot create
> extensions in temporary schema whose functions refer theirs other
> functions. I'd like to fix it or to find a workaround but cannot come
> up with a good idea yet.

Agreed.  Getting a schema mismatch is kind of disappointing, and it
depends on the DDL used in the extension SQL script.  I would suspect
that getting that addressed correctly may add quite some facility, for
little gain.  But I may be wrong, that's only the feeling coming from
a shiver in my back.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to