John Naylor <john.nay...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2/15/19, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> We should also strive to align "FAILED" properly. This is currently
>> quite unreadable:
>>
>> int4 ... ok (128 ms)
>> int8 ... FAILED (153 ms)
>> oid ... ok (163 ms)
>> float4 ... ok (231 ms)
> If I may play devil's advocate, who cares how long it takes a test to
> fail? If it's not difficult, leaving the time out for failures would
> make them stand out more.
Actually, I'd supposed that that might be useful info, sometimes.
For example it might help you guess whether a timeout had elapsed.
regards, tom lane
