>>>>> "Andres" == Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
>> It's likely to be hard to tell, given the amount of pink from the >> Ryu patch. If Andrew is not planning to clean that up PDQ, Besides crake (x-version), fulmar (icc) and lorikeet (cygwin), I hope the rest of the known failures should pass on the next cycle; the mac/ppc failures are because we redefine "bool" in a way that broke the upstream code's c99 assumptions, and the rest are numerical instability in ts_rank. >> I'd suggest reverting that patch pending having some repairs for it. Andres> I'd assume that breaking bit counting would cause distinct Andres> enough damage (compile time or crashes). That's not to say that Andres> reverting ryu shouldn't be considered (although I'm not that Andres> bothered by cross version, ia64 and cygwin failures, especially Andres> because the latter two might be hard to come by outside the Andres> bf). IA64 is working fine as far as I can see (specifically, anole is passing); it's ICC on x86_64 that broke (fulmar). -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
