On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 2:13 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> writes: > > Reading Tom's reply to my email, I wondered if performDeletion won't > > do more than what the code is already doing (except calling the right > > trigger deletion function which the current code doesn't), because the > > trigger in question is an internal trigger without any dependencies > > (the function it invokes are pinned by the system)? > > A big part of the point here is to not have to have such assumptions > wired into the fk-cloning code. But even if that internal dependency is > the only one the trigger is involved in, there are other steps in > deleteOneObject that shouldn't be ignored. For example, somebody > could've attached a comment to it.
Okay, I hadn't considered that far. Thanks for explaining. Regards, Amit
