On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 2019-02-05 11:55:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 06:34:50AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: > > >> Wow, thank you so much for your hard work. The last CF for PG 12 > should be tough... > > > > > Agreed. I am somewhat concerned about this and am wondering what we > can > > > do now to limit problems. > > > > There's been talk periodically of having an aggressive triage effort > > to try to sort through the pending patches and decide which ones have > > no hope of making it to commit in the last CF. Then, if we just push > > those off to the next cycle immediately and focus our attention on the > > ones that do have a credible chance, we might get more of the latter > > ones done. > > I'm planning to do a pass like I did for v11's last CF before the start > of it. That still requires others to chime in, my opinion alone > shouldn't be the sole deciding factor... > > What we'd talked about briefly at the Fosdem dev meeting was that a > field 'target release' or 'target branch' would be very useful to be > able to focus attention more. There's plenty stuff in the current CF > that is getting some attention, and deserves a bit more, but that > clearly isn't aimed for v12. Being able to filter by that would be huge. > > Magnus has said he'd try creating something like that. > This has now been pushed and is available. I've set it up with stable, 12 and 13 as possible versions for now, but I have not added any tags to the existing patches (except for one, in order to test it). -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
