On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:18 AM John Naylor <john.nay...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 4:17 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This one seems to be FSM test portability issue (due to different page > > contents, maybe). Looking into it, John, see if you are around and > > have some thoughts on it. > > Maybe we can use the same plpgsql loop as fsm.sql that exits after 1 > tuple has inserted into the 5th page. >
Yeah that can also work, but we still need to be careful about the alignment of that one tuple, otherwise, there will could be different free space on the fifth page. The probably easier way could be to use an even number of integers in the table say(int, int). Anyway, for now, I have avoided the dependency on FSM contents without losing on coverage of test. I have pushed my latest suggestion in the previous email. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
