Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:10 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Well, 8.2 is *very* long out of support, and there are plenty of
>> nasty bugs you're at risk of if you keep using it. So I don't
>> find this to be a good argument for contorting what we do in v12.
> Isn't the issue more a matter of whether it's OK to break
> compatibility without changing SO_*_VERSION?
We're breaking compatibility only if you regard pqsignal() as
part of the advertised API, which I don't.
regards, tom lane
